Archive for May, 2006

So much for whistle blowing

Wednesday, May 31st, 2006

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/05/30/national/w132119D75.DTL&type=politics

Stunning isn’t it? Monkey want, monkey get when it comes to Bush’s need to keep his secrets hidden until he’s out of office.

This of course is a public plea to anyone who in the future will be stuck with a moral dilema..

If you know Americans are being done wrong, lied to, killed, maimed, or hurt in anyway, scream it. If something against the law, or you think is being done against the law, report it to your superiors. If the proper chain of command is ignoring or threatening you, then still, scream it.

Resist it, and we’ll protect you. The public is still more powerfull than a President. We can impeach the President by sheer protests alone.

We’ve just never done it before.

Imagine 30 million people walking on The Hill, streaming into their respective Senator’s wing, chanting impeach Bush.

Who wants Cheney in office anyway, but it would go down in history as being when Washington -had to listen-. No law can 100%, totally, envelope you in the babe’s clothes you once wore Bush.

Too bad you don’t debate the common man, forced to read and hear about every single one of your follies.

I know I could use a 750gb storage bin

Tuesday, May 30th, 2006

With all the video, source code, and multiple partitions I have, I’m sure to have one soon.

I’m ready to lose everything in one, dramatic hard drive crash.

http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q2/barracuda-7200.10/index.x?pg=1

Encrypt yourself talking

Wednesday, May 24th, 2006

There really isn’t any reason why the government is listening to you, honestly. But you slip up, then you’re sent out to Egypt to they can torture you.

It could all have been avoided with:
http://www.cryptophone.de/

Ok, ok, I’m kidding. You are probably not going to be tortured, but phone records will be looked at deeper.

This phone has source that you can browse, performs deep encryption of said voice calls.

Good for mom and pop too

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

http://www.isp-planet.com/cplanet/tech/2006/prime_letter_060522.html

I do have some hesitation about this, seeing as I help run a small town wisp. However, they would be in another spectrum, and possibly even help lower costs more.

There is always a problem with free service, and it’s something I see when you have said free service.

Consumers have a funny mindset when it comes to something that’s free, and isn’t even supported with ads. They think free means full support, and you’ll take care of any problem they have, at your cost for free service.

Case in point, we had a client who piggybacked off my 900mhz gear that was repeated using 2.4ghz equipment. Things were mostly fine, signal quality was in 70% and very little drops, but the 2.4 ghz was slightly blocked by some trees.

Being a 2 mile link back to them, it would sometimes have a dropout or two, possibly slow down.

It’s important to mention that the client had service with the same wisp that I did business with, 4-6 months earlier. A local computer store, like ours decided to lie, cheat, and take a tower the wisp we had and turn it into his own.

None of us would go to that company for internet, they had done something really, really dirty. They also expected to use their own gear, so it’s another $250 investment. These guys claimed the gear was different, but it was the -same- wireless card inside the CPE.

So we shot a 900mhz signal through the top of a big, big hill and 1 mile of foliage to get it to this remote location from our computer store.

We hooked up the other clients too at a cost of almost a grand in antenna, tripod, access point and labor to do so.

They never paid one dime, nothing. So after 4 months of free internet, my boss cut them off. I told them they needed to come down and pay, but they never did. We also, to be fair didn’t send them a bill, they were told to just come down and pay a measly $20 a month.

You should have heard the phone conversation, it was nasty, she/he was -pissed-, pissed that it was cut off. They didn’t even have a clue that if they would have not given attitude about it being cut off, they could have just paid at that point.

Nope, in the end they paid $250 to hookup to the other wisp, who by the way… is inches from bankruptcy.

But, with 2.4ghz some links are just not possible. Even when they are, you have to take into account how the rest of your network is gonna react to all that retransmission of a dirty link.

I can’t imagine that these guys are gonna cover 95% of the US, with 2.1ghz. It’s gonna be 30 radios per square mile in almost everywhere they are, if it’s a big city. Rural areas are screwed, unless you use 30 radios. Then the biggest problems are getting tower space to get it to those places.

Billions, if not hundreds of billions. It’ll never hit here in WV, ever. Not gonna happen, but it may lower the cost of existing 2.4ghz equipment depending on whom they use.

I doubt they’ll do that though, it’d create more competition.

UK Hacker

Sunday, May 21st, 2006

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/05/10/uk.hacker.ap/index.html

How many times before has someone caused 700,000 dollars in damages just by typing in an IP address, then hitting enter?

I shudder everytime NMAP is ran by me, and I miss type one number, and it has happened before. Whoops, I just scanned 254 ip addresses… where? .. a quick whois lets me know, and it’s been some bad ones.

Is it illegal for me to scan my own machines from an outside network to make sure I’m closed up? Not that I know of. Is it illegal for me to mistype an IP address and scan military computers? Yup.

Can I type an IP address to Remote Desktop, or into VNC without breaking the law? I sure can, it’s a great thing, remoting into a machine.

What happens when I fudge the A class, and just by chances, hit an open military computer? 5 years and 250K fine.

FreeBSD Sun T1

Sunday, May 21st, 2006

I’m proud to announce that FreeBSD on the T1 is now stable enough that
it can “make buildworld” natively.

The source is currently available in perforce under the view
//depot/projects/kmacy_sun4v/… I probably won’t roll it back into
CVS until the logical domaining support is done. I’m looking forward
to receiving input from individuals who plan to deploy it to find out
what workloads to target in performance tuning.

-Kip

You’re actually reading it?

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

All views in this blog are just my opinion.

In reality and then sticking with the assumption that no two people share the same reality:

This is just thoughts, typed by fingers. There is freedom of speech, however there seems to be a distinction between the two major parts of your body that are responsible for said free speech.

This is my attempt called: freedom of thought. It sounds more hip, probably is a rarer saying, and you could get offended.

You may even think: why the hell did he just say that?

I’m wondering the same thing, so glad to see you are aboard.

Criminal Coders

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/legal/0,39020651,39270045,00.htm

I personally think python could be clumped together in this sort of a mess at some point. Perl of course is used in all sorts of “POC”’s that would allow an attack. (Proof Of Concept).

I can’t count the number of servers I’ve personally scanned just to see how bad a problem is. It does make you feel slightly better to scan a few hundred servers, see that there is many more targets than just you.

That of course doesn’t cut it anymore, since bot-nets want hundreds, (of thousands) of innocent machines to do their dirty work.

Audio Blogging Podcasts?

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1964680,00.asp

I think RadioActive is better called Blog Casting, or a blogcast for many reasons. However, without doing great speech recognition, and the already announced social thumbs up, it’s probably going to die out to be replaced by a better implementation.

But what can you say when someone has registered:
http://www.blogcast.com/

And doesn’t appear to be using it in the theme of something new, just the same old tired thing, with no innovation at all.

Cancer war

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

This is a little company that has a great idea for using our own resources for killing cancer. It’s a simple idea, once they realized what was keeping cancer invisible to our own defenses.

I was shocked that the article was so old, so I investigated some more, and was relieved to find out that they are still working on developing the medicine.

———-
Many forms of cancer cells have a disruption in TAP (transporter associated with antigen processing). These include melanoma, lung, prostate and breast cancers, and many others. Without a properly activated TAP, cancerous cells do not identify themselves to the immune system as an alien cell type and they remain camouflaged, allowing cancer to proliferate and eventually metastasize in the body. When TAP is properly activated in a cell it produces signals that indicate the identity of the cell to the immune system. GeneMax’s human version of a non-replicating TAP-1 cancer vaccine acts to stimulate the mechanisms required for the identity of the cancer cell to be recognized as foreign, which is expected to cause the cancer cells to be naturally eliminated by the immune system. Furthermore, GeneMax’s TAP-1 cancer vaccine appears to efficiently elicit an immune response towards cancer despite an individual’s genetic background.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/medicine/1281096.html
http://www.genemax.com/news.html

My grandmother died of small cell carcinoma. Sure, this might not be able to show promise in humans, but there is always the hope of a magic bullet.

Unlike my wife’s grandmother who is 20 years older than mine was when she died, and both have smoked since 14 years of age, I would probably have the same rate of disease that my grandmother had.